Lucid, highly readable, and full of rich social and political implications, “The Antitrust Paradox” illustrates how the purpose and integrity of law can be subverted. The Antitrust Paradox. By Robert H. Bork. New York: Basic Books, Pp. xi, $ The theme of former Solicitor General Bork’ s book is that the. THE ANTITRUST PARADOX: A POLICY AT WAR WITH. ITSELF. By Robert H. Bork. Basic Books, Inc., P xi, Price $ JAMES R. SILKENAT *.
|Published (Last):||16 April 2013|
|PDF File Size:||11.66 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||3.72 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Farid Nasution rated it really liked it Sep 15, Throughout the first part of the book he deftly reveals the stupidity and dissemblance that pervades much of the Supreme Court’s early jurisprudence in Antitrust law. Yet damned if he didn’t start to convince me that his views were better as I read the Antitrust Paradox.
Books by Robert H. Classic, even though his use of the term ‘consumer welfare’ gives me headaches on a daily basis From Wikipedia, the antitrush encyclopedia.
This book’s biggest problem is the difficult in when to go fast and when to go slow. All in all though, I guess I’ll look elsewhere for a good book to provide insight into the DOJ publishing lawsuit.
botk Hate the man, but don’t dismiss this work based on his subsequent infamy. Atnitrust rated it really liked it May 16, Now reissued with a new introduction and eiplogue by the author, this classic shows how antitrust suits adversely affect the consumer by encouraging a costly form of protection for inefficient and uncompetitive small businesses Robert Bork’s view of antitrust law has had a profound impact on how the law has been both interpreted and applied.
Preview — Antitrust Paradox by Robert H. Milad rated it it was amazing Aug 16, The book’s biggest substantive problem is that there’s a circular-ish assumption that relates to a series of assumptions: David rated it it was amazing Mar 23, Robert Heron Bork was an American legal scholar who advocated the judicial philosophy of originalism.
Feb 29, Thom rated it liked it Recommends it for: No trivia or quizzes yet. Bork argues that Congress enacted the Sherman Act as a “consumer welfare prescription. Chapter 7 was the most useful to me.
Account Options Sign in. And leaving aside the anttitrust expressions and implications of Bork’s many wri By now, other wise writers have an exposed and thoroughly discredited the tragic unpragmatism of Robert Bork’s formalist legal theory. Chris rated it liked it Nov 05, The paradox of antitrust enforcement was that legal intervention artificially raised prices by protecting inefficient enterprises from competition. A second edition, updated to reflect substantial changes in the law, was borm in Antitrust Paradox Robert H.
There are no discussion topics on this book yet.
Antitrust Paradox: A Policy at War with Itself
Shows how antitrust suits adversely affect the consumer by encouraging a costly form of protection for inefficient and uncompetitive small businesses. Thanks for telling us about the problem.
Board of Regents of Univ. In these tasks, Bork’s obrk as a lawyer and thinker are beyond reproach.
Antitrust Paradox: A Policy at War with Itself by Robert H. Bork
The book was cited by over a hundred courts. Now reissued with a new introduction and eiplogue by the author, this classic shows how antitrust suits adversely parado The Antitrust Paradox has shaped antitrust law in several ways, prominently by focusing the discipline on efficiency and articulating its goal as “consumer welfare.
Bork Snippet view – Since it first appeared inthis seminal work by one of the foremost legal minds of our age has dramatically changed the way the courts view government’s role in private affairs. Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
The Antitrust Paradox – Wikipedia
Bork argues that the original intent of antitrust laws as well as economic efficiency makes consumer welfare and the protection of competition, rather than competitors, the only goals of antitrust law. Many scholars, however, have shown that Congress had several motives for the adoption of the Sherman Act, probably none of which was “consumer welfare.
Return to Book Page. Basically, antitrust is only to a couple of really bad businessmen who try pardaox screw competitors even thought it is likely detrimental to them. But the names in the next are kind of distracting. Eric Zepp rated it it was ok Dec 08,